Do Excess Control Rights Benefit Creditors? Evidence from Dual-Class Firms
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Forthcoming
69 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2013 Last revised: 31 Jan 2020
Date Written: January 30, 2020
Abstract
Excess control rights by inside shareholders have been documented to hurt minority shareholders. This paper shows that such governance feature may benefit creditors. Using a sample of U.S. dual-class firms, I show that these firms take less operational and financial risk than similar single-class firms, consistent with insiders’ emphasis on long-term survival to access ongoing private control benefits. Such risk avoidance translates into lower borrowing costs for dual-class firms. Further, lenders are able to use specific covenants to prevent potential expropriations by insiders. The overall relationship between excess control rights and firm value may be less negative than previously thought.
Keywords: excess control rights; dual-class firms; risk-taking; cost of debt; debt covenant; private control benefits
JEL Classification: G21, G32, G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Recapitalization of One Class of Common Stock into Dual-Class: Growth and Long-Run Stock Returns
By Valentin Dimitrov and Prem C. Jain
-
Do Voting Rights Affect Institutional Investment Decisions? Evidence from Dual-Class Firms
By Kai Li, Hernan Ortiz-molina, ...
-
Overinvestment and the Operating Performance of SEO Firms
By Fangjian Fu
-
Disproportional Control Rights and the Bonding Role of Debt
By Aiyesha Dey, Xue Wang, ...
-
On the Decision to Go Public with Dual Class Stock
By Onur Arugaslan, Douglas O. Cook, ...
-
By Aiyesha Dey, Valeri V. Nikolaev, ...
-
The Value of Blockholder Liquidity and the Decision to Unify Share Classes
