No Evidence on Directional vs. Proximity
Political Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 1, Pp. 21-33, August, 1999
13 Pages Posted: 17 Jan 2008
Abstract
The directional and proximity models offer dramatically different theories for how voters make decisions and fundamentally divergent views of the supposed microfoundations on which vast bodies of literature in theoretical rational choice and empirical political behavior have been built. We demonstrate here that the empirical tests in the large and growing body of literature on this subject amount to theoretical debates about which statistical assumption is right. The key statistical assumptions have not been empirically tested and, indeed, turn out to be effectively untestable with exiting methods and data. Unfortunately, these assumptions are also crucial since changing them leads to different conclusions about voter processes.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Stephen J. Choi, Jill E. Fisch, ...
-
Empirical Models of Arbitrator Behavior Under Conventional Arbitration
-
Lay Juries Versus Professional Arbitrators and the Arbitrator Selection Hypothesis
-
When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs
-
Private Selection and Arbitrator Impartiality
By Alon Klement and Zvika Neeman
-
Party Matters: Heterogeneity in Party Characteristics when Explaining Electoral Support in Europe
By Mark N. Franklin and Lorenzo De Sio