Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: Evidence from Blackjack Tables
34 Pages Posted: 19 May 2009 Last revised: 13 Nov 2022
Date Written: May 2009
Abstract
Psychologists study regret primarily by measuring subjects' attitudes in laboratory experiments. This does not shed light on how expected regret affects economic actions in market settings. To address this, we use proprietary data from a blackjack table in Las Vegas to analyze how expected regret affects peoples''decisions during gambles. Even among a group of people who choose to participate in a risk-taking activity, we find strong evidence of an economically significant omission bias: players incur substantial losses by playing too conservatively. This behavior is prevalent even among large stakes gamblers, and becomes more severe following previous aggressive play, suggesting a rebound effect after aggressive play.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Deal or No Deal? Decision Making under Risk in a Large-Payoff Game Show
By Thierry Post, Martijn J. Van Den Assem, ...
-
Decision Making Under Risk in Deal or No Deal
By Nicolas De Roos and Yianis Sarafidis
-
Risk Attitudes in Large Stake Gambles: Evidence from a Game Show
By Cary A. Deck, Jungmin Lee, ...
-
Models of Stochastic Choice and Decision Theories: Why Both are Important for Analyzing Decisions
-
Testing the Predictions of Decision Theories in a Natural Experiment when Half a Million is at Stake