IEB Working Paper 2016/27
53 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2016
Date Written: October 25, 2016
There is a growing literature looking at how men and women respond differently to competition. We contribute to this literature by studying gender differences in performance in a high-stakes and male dominated competitive environment, expert chess tournaments. Our findings show that women under-perform compared to men of the same ability and that the gender composition of games drives this effect. Using within player variation in the conditionally random gender of their opponent, we find that women earn significantly worse outcomes against male opponents. We examine the mechanisms through which this effect operates by using a unique measure of within game quality of play. We find that the gender composition effect is driven by women playing worse against men, rather than by men playing better against women. The gender of the opponent does not affect a male player’s quality of play. We also find that men persist longer against women before resigning. These results suggest that the gender composition of competitions affects the behavior of both men and women in ways that are detrimental to the performance of women. Lastly, we study the effect of competitive pressure and find that players’ quality of play deteriorates when stakes increase, though we find no differential effect over the gender composition of games.
Keywords: Competition, Gender, Stereotype Threat, Chess
JEL Classification: D03, J16, J24, J70, L83, M50
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Backus, Peter and Cubel, Maria and Guid, Matej and Sanchez-Pages, Santiago and Mañas, Enrique López, Gender, Competition and Performance: Evidence from Real Tournaments (October 25, 2016). IEB Working Paper 2016/27. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2858984