Arms Races and Negotiations
27 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2002
Date Written: August 1, 2002
Abstract
We consider an "arms race" game, where two players simultaneously decide whether or not to aquire new weapons. Each player has a type, which is his private information. Types are independent. With probability close to one, the best outcome for each player is for neither to acquire new weapons (although each prefers to aquire new weapons if he thinks the opponent will). There is a small probability that a player is a dominant strategy type who always prefers to acquire new weapons. We find conditions under which the unique Bayesian Nash equilibrium involves an arms race with probability one. However, if the probability that a player is a dominant strategy type is sufficiently small, then there is an equilibrium of the cheap-talk extension of the game where the probability of an arms race is close to zero.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Global Games: Theory and Applications
By Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin
-
Demand Deposit Contracts and the Probability of Bank Runs
By Itay Goldstein and Ady Pauzner
-
Coordination Risk and the Price of Debt
By Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin
-
Coordination Failures and the Lender of Last Resort: Was Bagehot Right after All?
By Jean-charles Rochet and Xavier Vives
-
Equilibrium Selection in Global Games with Strategic Complementarities
By David M. Frankel, Stephen Morris, ...
-
By George-marios Angeletos, Christian Hellwig, ...
-
By George-marios Angeletos, Christian Hellwig, ...
-
Bank Runs: Liquidity and Incentives
By Russell Cooper and Thomas W. Ross
-
Crises and Prices: Information Aggregation, Multiplicity and Volatility
-
Crises and Prices: Information Aggregation, Multiplicity and Volatility