Voting Transparency in a Monetary Union
28 Pages Posted: 17 Aug 2005
There are 2 versions of this paper
Date Written: July 2005
Abstract
We examine whether the central bank council of a monetary union should publish its voting records when members are appointed by national politicians. We show that the publication of voting records lowers overall welfare if the private benefits of holding office are sufficiently low. High private benefits of central bankers lower overall welfare under opacity, as they induce European central bankers to care more about being re-appointed than about beneficial policy outcomes. We show that opacity and low private benefits jointly guarantee the optimal welfare level. Moreover, we suggest that non-renewable terms for national central bankers and delegating the appointment of all council members to a European agency would be desirable.
Keywords: Central banks, transparency voting
JEL Classification: D70, E58
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
IZA Institute of Labor Economics
P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany
CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)
Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Transparency and Credibility: Monetary Policy with Unobservable Goals
By Jon Faust and Lars E. O. Svensson
-
Social Value of Public Information: Morris and Shin (2002) is Actually Pro Transparency, Not Con
-
Transparency of Information and Coordination in Economies with Investment Complementarities
-
Transparency of Information and Coordination in Economies with Investment Complementarities
-
Efficient Use of Information and Social Value of Information