Download This PaperRegulating Product Return Policies: The Trade-off between Efficiency and Distribution
52 The Journal of Legal Studies 137-191 (2023)
63 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2018 Last revised: 20 May 2023
Date Written: March 8, 2021
Abstract
For the published version of this article, see 52 Journal of Legal Studies 137 (2023).
The proliferation of product returns entails substantial financial and environmental costs. Nonetheless, regulators typically restrict firms from charging high fees from consumers who return products, thereby facilitating product returns. To analyze the consequences of such interventions, we consider a market in which consumers have private information on their expected consumption utility. We show that monopolistic sellers have an incentive to trigger inefficiently many returns even without regulation, as low return fees enable them to screen consumers and reap their surplus.
Regulators then face a trade-off: upper bounds on return fees exacerbate the inefficiency by causing the seller to trigger even more returns, but also lead to a redistribution of wealth from monopolistic sellers to consumers. This trade-off also arises when consumers have an endowment effect. However, if sellers can induce overoptimistic beliefs about the utility from consumption (e.g. through advertisements), then upper bounds on return fees may also lead to higher social welfare.
Keywords: product returns, return policy, consumer protection, consumer uncertainty, cancellations, withdrawals
JEL Classification: D11, D18, D9, K20
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation