The Role of Non-Interference in Preferences for Autonomy in Pay

27 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2020 Last revised: 18 Nov 2024

See all articles by Elena Pikulina

Elena Pikulina

Finance Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia (UBC)

Chloe Tergiman

The Pennsylvania State University

Date Written: January 7, 2020

Abstract

Recent literature points to individuals having preferences for autonomy, which has two dimensions. The first is an individual’s ability to influence their own outcomes. The second is enjoying a certain degree of non-interference from others. In this paper, we focus on the non-interference in pay. We show that most subjects are unwilling to pay to reduce interference from others when this reduction has no instrumental value. That is, they do not have intrinsic preferences for non-interference. However, those who do show such preferences are willing to sacrifice a meaningful part of their pay to reduce non-interference.

Keywords: Independence, freedom, non-interference, authority, control, Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism, laboratory experiment

JEL Classification: C91, D01, D91, M54

Suggested Citation

Pikulina, Elena and Tergiman, Chloe,
The Role of Non-Interference in Preferences for Autonomy in Pay
(January 7, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3515050 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3515050

Elena Pikulina (Contact Author)

Finance Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia (UBC) ( email )

2053 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2
Canada
6048223314 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://epikulina.com

Chloe Tergiman

The Pennsylvania State University ( email )

University Park
State College, PA 16802
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
142
Abstract Views
1,249
Rank
521,245
PlumX Metrics