Do They Do It For The Money?

32 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2009 Last revised: 12 May 2014

Utpal Bhattacharya

Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST) - HKUST School of Business and Management

Cassandra D. Marshall

University of Richmond - Department of Finance

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 9, 2011

Abstract

Using a sample of all top management who were indicted for illegal insider trading in the United States for trades during the period 1989-2002, we explore the economic rationality of this white-collar crime. If this crime is an economically rational activity in the sense of Becker (1968), where a crime is committed if its expected benefits exceed its expected costs, “poorer” top management should be doing the most illegal insider trading. This is because the “poor” have less to lose (present value of foregone future compensation if caught is lower for them.) We find in the data, however, that indictments are concentrated in the “richer” strata after we control for firm size, industry, firm growth opportunities, executive age, the opportunity to commit illegal insider trading, and the possibility that regulators target the “richer” strata. We thus rule out the economic motive for this white-collar crime, and leave open the possibility of other motives.

Keywords: white-collar crime, insider trading, SEC enforcement, CEO compensation

JEL Classification: G14, G18, G34, G38

Suggested Citation

Bhattacharya , Utpal and Marshall, Cassandra D., Do They Do It For The Money? (November 9, 2011). AFA 2011 Denver Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1356118 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1356118

Utpal Bhattacharya (Contact Author)

Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST) - HKUST School of Business and Management ( email )

Clear Water Bay
Kowloon
Hong Kong

Cassandra Dawn Marshall

University of Richmond - Department of Finance ( email )

1 Gateway Rd
Richmond, VA 23173
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
664
Rank
17,553
Abstract Views
4,795