Private-Collective Innovation, Competition, and Firms’ Counterintuitive Appropriation Strategies
50 Pages Posted: 7 Jul 2009 Last revised: 23 Sep 2011
Date Written: August 20, 2011
Abstract
We extend theory on private-collective innovation by studying the role of exclusion rights for technology in the competition between private-collective and other innovators. We argue that private-collective innovators both pledge their own and invest in orphan exclusion rights for technology as a subtle coordination mechanism to compete against firms proposing alternative proprietary solutions. We discuss implications of our findings for theories of innovation, particularly appropriation strategy, ownership and control, and coordination and industry self-regulation.
Keywords: Private-collective innovation, exclusion rights, competition, appropriation strategy, interfirm coordination, control, industry self-regulation, open source software
JEL Classification: L10, O32, D23, L59, O33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Strategic Responses to the Reputation Commons Problem
By Andrew A. King, Michael Lenox, ...
-
What Explains the Uneven Take-Up of Iso 14001 at the Global Level? A Panel Data Analysis
By Eric Neumayer and Richard Perkins
-
Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: A Longitudinal Analysis of an Industry Self-Regulatory Institution
By Michael L. Barnett and Andrew A. King
-
Waves of Collectivizing: A Dynamic Model of Competition and Cooperation Over the Life of an Industry
-
From Me to We...And Back Again: Returning to Business as Usual
-
Beyond Corporate Reputation: Managing Reputational Interdependence
-
Tarred and Untarred by the Same Brush: Exploring Interdependence in the Volatility of Stock Returns