Systemic Risk and Market Institutions
Yale Journal on Regulation, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2009
University of Pennsylvania, Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-26
15 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2009
Date Written: 2009
Abstract
With private-label mortgage-backed securities (MBS), investors bore default risk; while this risk should have been priced, as systemic risk grew, the pricing of risk did not increase. This paper attempts to explain why this happened. We point to market institutions’ incentive misalignments that cause asset prices to rise above fundamentals, producing systemic risk. The model attributes the asset price inflation to the provision of underpriced credit as lending institutions misprice risk to gain market share. The resulting asset price inflation itself then generates further expansion of underpriced credit.
Keywords: Real estate, mortgages, housing, mortgage-backed securities, pricing of risks, default risk, incentive misalignments, underpriced credit, asset price inflation, market bubbles
JEL Classification: G21, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Real Estate Booms and Banking Busts: An International Perspective
-
Subprime Lending and Real Estate Markets
By Susan M. Wachter, Andrey D. Pavlov, ...
-
Subprime Lending and the Housing Bubble: Tail Wags Dog?
By Khasadyahu Zarbabal, Michael Lacour-little, ...
-
Office Market Values During the Past Decade: How Distorted Have Appraisals Been?
-
Underpriced Lending and Real Estate Markets
By Andrey D. Pavlov and Susan M. Wachter
-
The Housing Finance Revolution
By Richard K. Green and Susan M. Wachter
-
Underpriced Default Spread Exacerbates Market Crashes
By Winston T.h. Koh, Roberto S. Mariano, ...