The Opt-In Revolution? Contraception and the Gender Gap in Wages

44 Pages Posted: 23 Mar 2012 Last revised: 21 Jun 2024

See all articles by Martha J. Bailey

Martha J. Bailey

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Economics

Brad Hershbein

W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

Amalia R. Miller

University of Virginia - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: March 2012

Abstract

Decades of research on the U.S. gender gap in wages describes its correlates, but little is known about why women changed their career paths in the 1960s and 1970s. This paper explores the role of "the Pill" in altering women's human capital investments and its ultimate implications for life-cycle wages. Using state-by-birth-cohort variation in legal access, we show that younger access to the Pill conferred an 8-percent hourly wage premium by age fifty. Our estimates imply that the Pill can account for 10 percent of the convergence of the gender gap in the 1980s and 30 percent in the 1990s.

Suggested Citation

Bailey, Martha Jane and Hershbein, Brad and Miller, Amalia R., The Opt-In Revolution? Contraception and the Gender Gap in Wages (March 2012). NBER Working Paper No. w17922, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2027804

Martha Jane Bailey (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Economics ( email )

8283 Bunche Hall
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1477
United States

Brad Hershbein

W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research ( email )

Amalia R. Miller

University of Virginia - Department of Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 400182
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4182
United States

HOME PAGE: http://people.virginia.edu/~am5by/

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States