Dynamic Pricing and Organic Waste Bans: A Study of Grocery Retailers' Incentives to Reduce Food Waste

42 Pages Posted: 28 Jun 2017 Last revised: 22 Dec 2023

See all articles by Robert Evan Sanders

Robert Evan Sanders

University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Rady School of Management

Date Written: May 12, 2020

Abstract

I analyze the welfare effects of two potential solutions to excess grocery-retail food waste: dynamic pricing and organic waste landfill bans. I use a structural econometric model with sales, perishability, and marginal cost data from a grocery chain’s artisanal bread category. My analysis of these counterfactuals shows that dynamic pricing Pareto-dominates an organic waste ban: Dynamic pricing reduces waste by 21% while increasing the chain’s gross margins and consumer surplus by 3% and 0.3%, respectively. In contrast, an organic waste ban, simulated by a ten-fold increase in disposal costs, reduces waste by only 4% and decreases profits and consumer surplus. Therefore, if regulators want to reduce grocery-store waste, they should incentivize chains to adopt dynamic pricing over imposing organic waste bans.

(Formerly titled "Reducing Retailer Food Waste through Revenue Management")

Keywords: dynamic pricing, environmental externality, food waste, organic waste ban, mandatory-recycling program

JEL Classification: D61, D62, H21, H23, Q58, D81

Suggested Citation

Sanders, Robert Evan, Dynamic Pricing and Organic Waste Bans: A Study of Grocery Retailers' Incentives to Reduce Food Waste (May 12, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2994426 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2994426

Robert Evan Sanders (Contact Author)

University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Rady School of Management ( email )

9500 Gilman Drive
Rady School of Management
La Jolla, CA 92093
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,702
Abstract Views
7,002
Rank
21,139
PlumX Metrics