Examiner Characteristics and Patent Office Outcomes

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 369

94 Review of Economics and Statistics 817 (2012)

11 Pages Posted: 19 Jan 2009 Last revised: 28 Apr 2020

See all articles by Mark A. Lemley

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School

Bhaven N. Sampat

Johns Hopkins University - School of Government & Policy; Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: January 1, 2009

Abstract

In this paper, we show that there are important differences across patent examiners at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and that these relate to the most important decision made by the USPTO: whether or not to grant a patent. We find that more experienced examiners, and those who systematically cite less prior art, are more likely to grant patent applications. These results are not encouraging as a matter of public policy. But they do point to human resource policies as potentially important levers in patent system reform.

JEL Classification: O34, O38

Suggested Citation

Lemley, Mark A. and Sampat, Bhaven N., Examiner Characteristics and Patent Office Outcomes (January 1, 2009). Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 369, 94 Review of Economics and Statistics 817 (2012), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1329091 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1329091

Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Bhaven N. Sampat

Johns Hopkins University - School of Government & Policy ( email )

United States

HOME PAGE: http://bhavensampat.github.io

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School ( email )

100 International Drive
Baltimore, MD 21202
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
992
Abstract Views
8,199
Rank
57,935
PlumX Metrics