Mental Models, Decision Rules, and Performance Heterogeneity
Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 569-594
MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4736-09
UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper No. 2011 STRE 02
51 Pages Posted: 21 May 2008 Last revised: 14 Apr 2011
There are 2 versions of this paper
Mental Models, Decision Rules, and Performance Heterogeneity
Mental Models, Decision Rules, Strategies and Performance Heterogeneity
Date Written: May 21, 2008
Abstract
This paper focuses on the role of managerial cognition as a source of heterogeneity in firm strategies and performance. We link differences in mental models to differences in decision rules and performance in a management simulation. Our results show more accurate mental models lead to better decision rules and higher performance. We also find that decision makers do not need accurate knowledge of the entire business environment; accurate mental models of the key principles are sufficient to achieve superior performance. A fundamental assumption in much of strategic management is that managers who have a richer understanding about organizational capabilities and the dynamics of industry structure can improve the performance of their firms. Our findings provide empirical evidence supporting this assumption and show that differences in mental models help explain ex ante why managers and firms adopt different strategies and achieve different levels of competitive success.
Keywords: Mental Models, Decision Rules, Cognitive Frames, Heuristics, Knowledge Representations, Schema
JEL Classification: C91, C63, D81, M10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation