Real Interest, Money Surprises and Anticipated Inflation
29 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2007 Last revised: 28 Sep 2022
Date Written: December 1981
Abstract
This paper investigates the hypothesis that surprise changes in the money supply and anticipated inflation (the Mundell-Tobin effect) are both inversely related to the expected real interest rate. The two novel aspects of the investigation are tests of the hypothesized impact of money surprises on real rates while simultaneously testing the Mundell-Tobin hypothesis and estimation employing transfer function methodology developed by Box and Jenkins (1970). The transfer function enables the investigator to entertain the hypothesis that residuals may not follow a simple AR-1 process, as is usually assumed in corrections for correlated residuals, but rather may be appropriately represented by a more complex ARMA process. Based on quarterly data from 1959-1 - 1980-IVY results obtained constitutes failure to reject either an inverse relationship between money surprises and expected real interest or an inverse relationship between anticipated inflation and expected real interest. These findings do not constitute a rejection of market efficiency.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Inflation Forecast Uncertainty
By Paolo Giordani and Paul Söderlind
-
By Paolo Giordani and Paul Söderlind
-
Anticipated Money, Inflation Uncertainty, and Real Economic Activity
-
Comparing the Point Predictions and Subjective Probability Distributions of Professional Forecasters
By Joseph Engelberg, Charles F. Manski, ...
-
By Robert W. Rich and Joseph S. Tracy
-
Measuring Forecast Uncertainty by Disagreement: The Missing Link
By Kajal Lahiri and Xuguang Simon Sheng
-
An Introduction to the Ecb's Survey of Professional Forecasters