First Do No Harm?: Tort Reform and Birth Outcomes
51 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2006 Last revised: 7 Aug 2022
Date Written: August 2006
Abstract
We examine the impact of tort reforms using U.S. birth records for 1989-2001. We make four contributions: First, we develop a model that analyzes the incentives created by specific tort reforms. Second, we assemble new data on tort reform. Third, we examine a range of outcomes. Finally, we allow for differential effects by demographic/risk group. We find that reforms of the "deep pockets rule" reduce complications of labor and C-sections, while caps on noneconomic damages increase them. Our results demonstrate there are important interactions between incentives created by tort law and other incentives facing physicians.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Medical Malpractice Reform and Physicians in High-Risk Specialties
By Jonathan Klick and Thomas Stratmann
-
Does Malpractice Liability Keep the Doctor Away? Evidence from Tort Reform Damage Caps
-
An Empirical Study of the Impact of Tort Reforms on Medical Malpractice Payments
-
Defensive Medicine and Disappearing Doctors?
By Katherine Baicker and Amitabh Chandra
-
The Impact of Tort Reform on Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Premiums
By Ronen Avraham, Leemore S. Dafny, ...
-
The Impact of Tort Reform on Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Premiums
By Ronen Avraham, Leemore S. Dafny, ...
-
An Ehealth Diptych: The Impact of Privacy Regulation on Medical Error and Malpractice Litigation
-
Electronic Discovery and the Adoption of Information Technology