Correcting Expected Utility for Comparisons Between Alternative Outcomes: A Unified Parameterization of Regret and Disappointment
17 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2008 Last revised: 20 Nov 2008
Date Written: 2008
Abstract
A unified parameterization of an expected utility model corrected for regret and disappointment effects is presented, constrained to conform to a well-known choice pattern, the common consequence effect, a special case of the Allais paradox. For choices subject to regret and disappointment effects to be consistent with this choice pattern, the function that corrects the utility of the obtained outcome has to have a positive second derivative for its regret component and a negative second derivative for its disappointment component. These hypothesized functional forms make predictions about the relative effect that small vs. large differences between obtained and alternative outcomes should have on people's experiences of regret or disappointment.
Keywords: Regret, Disappointment, Alternative outcomes
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(K) Participation and Savings Behavior
-
The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(K) Participation and Savings Behavior
-
The Effects of Financial Education in the Workplace: Evidence from a Survey of Employers
By Patrick J. Bayer, B. Douglas Bernheim, ...
-
By Esther Duflo and Emmanuel Saez
-
By Esther Duflo and Emmanuel Saez
-
For Better or for Worse: Default Effects and 401(K) Savings Behavior
By James J. Choi, David Laibson, ...
-
The Illusory Effects of Saving Incentives on Saving
By William G. Gale, Eric M. Engen, ...