Manipulation and Equity-Based Compensation
13 Pages Posted: 24 Apr 2011
Date Written: January 18, 2008
Abstract
This paper models optimal executive compensation in a setting where managers are in a position to influence the public perception of their company, and thus the short-term stock price. Stock prices take the possibility of manipulation into account but fail to fully back it out, the degree of manipulation, due to investors’ uncertainty about managers’ ability to manipulate effectively. An novel property of our specification is that it is the elasticity of managers' wealth to firm value, not the sensitivity, that determines effort. We show that manipulation costs result in an optimal contract that has a lower equilibrium choice of effort, even though the elasticity of pay with respect to the stock price may be higher if there is uncertainty about the degree of manipulation. We conclude by discussing possible extensions to the model and policy implications.
Keywords: Manipulation, executive compensation, pay elasticity
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels
By John E. Core and Wayne R. Guay
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: the Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Stock Options for Undiversified Executives
By Brian J. Hall and Kevin J. Murphy