When is More Better? On the Relationship between Magnitude and Subjective Value
Current Trend in Psychological Science, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2005
4 Pages Posted: 11 Oct 2006
Abstract
We examine three determinants of the relationship between the magnitude of a stimulus and a person's subjective value of the stimulus: the process by which value is assessed (either by feeling or by calculation),the evaluability of the relevantmagnitude variable (whether the desirability of a given level of that variable can be evaluated independently), and the mode of evaluation(whether stimuli are encountered and evaluated jointly or separately). Reliance on feeling, lack of evaluability, and single evaluation lead to insensitivity to magnitude. An analysis invoking these factors provides a novel account for why people typically become less sensitive to changes in the magnitude of a stimulus as the magnitude increases.
Keywords: utility function, prospect theory, evaluability, scope-insensitivity, experienced utility, joint evaluation, separate evaluation
JEL Classification: D81, D11, D12, D91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Christopher K. Hsee, George Loewenstein, ...
-
Preference Reversals and the Measurement of Environmental Values
By Julie R. Irwin, Paul Slovic, ...
-
Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value
-
Elastic Justification: How Tempting But Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence Decisions
-
Elastic Justification: How Unjustifiable Factors Influence Judgments
-
Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision
By Christopher K. Hsee, Frank Yu, ...
-
A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
By James J. Murphy, P. Geoffrey Allen, ...
-
Distinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation
By Christopher K. Hsee and Jiao Zhang
-
Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options