The Organization of Delegated Expertise
46 Pages Posted: 7 Oct 2004
Date Written: August 2004
Abstract
This Paper proposes a theory of the optimal organization of delegated expertise. For incentive purposes, a principal should reward an expert when their recommendation is confirmed either by the facts or by other experts' recommendations. With a single expert, we show that the agency costs of delegated expertise exhibit diseconomies of scale. Possible organizational responses to this problem include basing decisions on a less than optimal amount of information, and relying on multiple experts. We analyze the source of gains from having multiple experts in different contracting environments corresponding to different nexi of collusion between the principal and/or the experts.
Keywords: Expertise, organization, collusion
JEL Classification: D80
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A Theory of Influence: The Strategic Value of Public Ignorance
By Isabelle Brocas and Juan D. Carrillo
-
A Theory of Influence: The Strategic Value of Public Ignorance
By Isabelle Brocas and Juan D. Carrillo
-
Delegated Expertise - When are Good Projects Bad News?
By Markus Walzl and Eberhard Feess
-
Are We All Better Drivers than Average? Self-Perception and Biased Behaviour
By Isabelle Brocas and Juan D. Carrillo
-
Active Agents, Passive Principals: Does High-Powered CEO Compensation Really Improve Incentives?
By James Dow and Clara C. Raposo
-
Reconceptualizing the Expert Witness: Social Costs, Current Controls and Proposed Responses
-
Do Managers with Limited Liability Take More Risky Decisions? An Information Acquisition Model