Teacher Quality and Incentives: Theoretical and Empirical Effects of Standards on Teacher Quality
28 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2004
Date Written: October 2004
Abstract
Applying the theory of yardstick competition to the schooling system, we show that it is optimal to have central tests of student achievement and to engage in benchmarking because it raises the quality of teaching. This is true even if teachers' pay (defined in monetary terms) is not performance related. If teachers value reputation, and if teaching output is measured so that it becomes comparable, teachers will increase their effort. The theory is tested using the German PISA-E data. Our estimates suggest that, despite the flat career profile of German teachers, the quality of teaching tends to be higher in federal states with central exams.
Keywords: education, teacher quality, central examinations, yardstick competition, matching
JEL Classification: I28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating
By Brian Jacob and Steven D. Levitt
-
By Paul Glewwe, Nauman Ilias, ...
-
By Brian Jacob
-
Winning Isn't Everything: Corruption in Sumo Wrestling
By Mark Duggan and Steven D. Levitt
-
The Market for Teacher Quality
By Eric A. Hanushek, John F. Kain, ...
-
Food for Thought: The Effects of School Accountability Plans on School Nutrition
By David N. Figlio and Joshua Winicki
-
The Central Role of Noise in Evaluating Interventions that Use Test Scores to Rank Schools
By Kenneth Y. Chay, Patrick J. Mcewan, ...
-
Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?