Dilemmas and Bargains: Autism, Theory-of-Mind, Cooperation and Fairness

74 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2003

See all articles by Elisabeth Hill

Elisabeth Hill

University College London - Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience

David F. Sally

Independent

Abstract

Mentalising is assumed to be involved in decision-making that is necessary to social interaction. We investigated the relationship between mentalising and two types of strategic games - those involving the choice to cooperate with another for joint gain or compete for own gain and those involving bargaining and division of a surplus - in children and adults with and without autistic spectrum disorders. The results suggest that strategic responses in the first type of game, the well-known prisoner's dilemma, are associated with mentalising ability. In contrast, generosity in bargaining tasks did not depend upon mentalising skills, but initial strategically unequal offers did. These two essential social games appeared to be differentially compensated for in high-functioning individuals with autistic spectrum disorders.

Keywords: autism, game theory, bargaining, cooperation, dilemmas, theory-of-mind, experiments

JEL Classification: C72, C78, Z13, A12

Suggested Citation

Hill, Elisabeth and Sally, David, Dilemmas and Bargains: Autism, Theory-of-Mind, Cooperation and Fairness. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=407040 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.407040

Elisabeth Hill (Contact Author)

University College London - Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience ( email )

17 Queen Square
London WC1N 3AR
United Kingdom
+44 (0)20 7679 1177 (Phone)

David Sally

Independent

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
707
Abstract Views
7,427
rank
35,255
PlumX Metrics