A Theoretical and Experimental Appraisal of Five Risk Elicitation Methods

Jena Economic Research Paper No. 2013-009

28 Pages Posted: 20 Feb 2013

See all articles by Paolo Crosetto

Paolo Crosetto

Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory

Antonio Filippin

Università degli Studi di Milano; IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: February 19, 2013

Abstract

We perform a comparative analysis of five incentivized tasks used to elicit risk preferences. Theoretically, we compare the elicitation methods in terms of completeness of the range of the estimates as well as their precision, the likelihood of triggering loss aversion, and problems arising when multiple choices are required. Using original data from a homogeneous population, we experimentally investigate the distribution of estimated risk preferences, whether they differ by gender, and the complexity of the tasks. We do so using both non-parametric tests and a structural model estimated with maximum likelihood. We find that the estimated risk aversion parameters vary greatly across tasks and that gender differences appear only when the task is more likely to trigger loss aversion.

Keywords: Risk attitudes, Elicitation methods, Experiment

JEL Classification: C81, C91, D81

Suggested Citation

Crosetto, Paolo and Filippin, Antonio, A Theoretical and Experimental Appraisal of Five Risk Elicitation Methods (February 19, 2013). Jena Economic Research Paper No. 2013-009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2220631 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2220631

Paolo Crosetto (Contact Author)

Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory ( email )

BP 47
38040 Grenoble
France

Antonio Filippin

Università degli Studi di Milano ( email )

Milan, 20122
Italy

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
74
Abstract Views
417
rank
108,866
PlumX Metrics